Movie Review: Wanted

•June 27, 2008 • Leave a Comment

WantedSo, I caught a midnight showing of Wanted. To be honest, I was not very interested in seeing this movie. From the previews I saw it looked really goofy. But, about a week ago, I discovered that Wanted was based on a comic akin to Sin City and V for Vendetta.  So, I thought, what the hell, the opportunity arose, so I went.

And guess what… It was awesome (despite the predictability). The action was ridiculous. It was funny, witty, and a lot of fun to watch in the theaters. I would have given it 7 out of ten, but as I was walking out of the theater I heard someone say, “Man the writer of that movie HATES middle America. Fucking middle class, white collar, bullshit. That movie was awesome.” And so as I reexamined the movie, I was startled to find out that he was right. I was so absorbed in the action that it took some puissant, teenage, class warrior to point out the rhetoric behind the fight scenes and comedy. Phrases like “Obey the weave,” “Follow the Code,” “Sacrifice one, save a thousand” are among the more egregious talking points from the cast. It is an assault not only the individual, but also on being a productive member of society. The movie follows a panic-attack-stricken accountant who is living the “American dream.” Suddenly, he is given the opportunity to rise above and join something greater than the individual society and join the Fraternity. The movie ends with the line, “What the fuck have you done lately,” as if having a job is not a valid life choice. Thinking back, i should have been waiting for “workers of the world, unite.”

Still, despite the ridiculous rhetoric, it was a fun movie. I was pleasantly surprised.

Over all 6 out of 10. I would definitely burn it when it comes out.

Non-Contradiction

•June 23, 2008 • 1 Comment

Athena, Goddess of Reason and Wisdom

I get to arguments with people all the time with whom it is impossible to argue. I have no recourse, no way in which to talk to them. They do accept the basic premises for which argument can ensue. It always ends on there end with something along the following lines: “Well, that may be true for, but it isn’t true for me.” How can something be true and not true at the same time? That is a contradiction.

This is pseudo-relativism. Originally, when it first began, relativism was the statement that there are a lot of different beliefs out there, and one must make an educated choice as to which is true among those various options. But, most people, in their quest for intellectual enlightenment, stop with the first part- the recognition that there are a lot of beliefs. People seemed satisfied to stop there.

The foolishness stops here. A is A. A can’t be A and not A at the same time, or at anytime. When we talk about principles, those things which are statements of truth, they cannot be true and not true. Since the principles themselves are eternal, A is either A, or A is not A.

Now, something can be one thing and potentially be something else at another point in time. Take Ice. Ice is solid at the time it is ice, but it also holds in it the potential to take on two other states at other periods of time (gas or liquid). But, again, these are not principles or truths as we have been speaking of them. Principles and truths are reflections on the eternal things. They do not change.

Principles and Truths, being what they are, are debatable. But they must be debated, discussed, argued over. These truths are not easy to arrive at, by any means. But, nonetheless, they can be arrived at. Not, however, by simply stating, “Well that may be true for you.” It is the fear of truth that leads to this nonsense. It is a fear of having examine beliefs, of testing them against the minds of others, of being found false that leads to the belief in the contradictions.

Allowing for contradictions is like having a brain and not having one.

The BrainDoes not EqualNo Brain

Why?

Faith and Economy

•June 21, 2008 • 1 Comment

Someone asked me the other day how I believed the things I believe about the economy and still considered myself Christian. She, herself an agnostic, was pulling on her beliefs about what Christianity was, which are, as usual, misconceptions about what is actually in the bible (granted, usually pulled from people who are just “preaching the word” from the pulpit) and what a capitalist is and believes.

The capitalists preconceptions are harder to dispel, so we will leave them for later, but we can, presently, clear up what Christianity preaches. Now, Christianity does preach charity and giving. There is no doubt about that. Any fool who picks up a bible could see, easily, that Christianity believes in giving things to others. But, contrary to what most believe, there is no explicit commandment to give to those who do not deserve it. Paul, in the third chapter of Second Letter to the Thessalonians, writes that no body should receive if they do not work. No one is entitled to a share of something the did not contribute to. Instead, as it says in Romans chapter four we learn that wages are the obligatory result of work rendered.

Furthermore, on a more theoretical level, we must take note that as soon as God brings His people out of the desert, he establishes basic rights. By implying a positive to the negative commandments, we learn that there are several principles to be pulled from the ten commandments. A right to life (do not murder), a right to pursue happiness (rest on the sabbath, i.e. leisure time), right to a fair liberty from tyranny (false witness), but most importantly for our purposes here, a right to property (do not steal) and right to earn unfettered from others (do not covet). Those two are so closely linked that it is hard to distinguish. The first guarantees the right to have property, by refusing others the right to physically take it from you. That is simple enough. The second, i.e. do not covet thy neighbors things, and that is just it. People get what they earn. Do not desire someone else’s stuff. Get your own stuff. That is the positive. Earn your own. It really is just that simple.

That is Christianity, well not all, but everything that has to do with property and wages. The rest is much more simple, and dealt with on other posts in this blog.

Life, liberty, and happiness are the things that we Capitalist embrace and champion. We believe that everyone, every single individual, has the right to these things. The have the right to exist, in life. They have the right to unhindered freedom, in liberty. And they have the right to the pursuit of whatever makes them happy. Capitalists are often characterized as evil, mean, money-grubbing pigs. It is easy to see them this way when people are not told what money is, and what capitalists actually have to do with it.

Money is simply the physically representation of societal appreciation. When earned, it is peoples way of saying thank you for what you have done. Think about one of the richest men in the world Bill Gates. He got there by developing computer software to a point that were accessible and affordable for everyone. All the money he has made is only a drop in bucket compared to wealth that all the users of his product have generated through its use. Not mention the other utility people get from using Windows, e.g. computer games, writing, and many other leisure activities.

Now the point that most people try to make is that he is so rich he needs to give back. But they fail to see that he has given. It was his product that he gave, and people bought it. It was his “gift” that people are rewarding when they purchase it. You do this everyday when you buy one thing instead of another. You show your appreciation for one person’s product to another. In fact, Bill Gates has given back. He owes us nothing more. By buying something, you say that you like the product. By not buying something, you say you do not like (or at least not enough to buy it). On larger scales, it is this principle that generates wealth for one individual or does not allow another to stay in business.

But, that is not to say that people cannot give above and beyond what they offer in the marketplace. In fact most capitalists do. There are causes and charities that have a particular affinity for to which they donate their time or money. It is their time and money, and they can do with it as they please. They have a right to it, you do not. If they chose to, and again most do, they can donate extra.

Capitalism is not against Christianity, nor is the inverse true. In fact, Christianity values the same things that capitalism does: Life, Freedom, Happiness. Capitalism is the recognition people have a right to what they work for, so does Christianity. More importantly, Christianity believes in showing appreciation for good deeds, the very corner stone of Capitalism.

It is all so simple and logical when just examined beyond the surface. Capitalism and Christianity are not incompatible.

Pages Updated

•June 14, 2008 • Leave a Comment

All the pages have been updated. Check out the updates.

Back from Vacation

•June 1, 2008 • Leave a Comment

I have just returned from 10 days in Texas visiting my parents.  I will be writing, opining, etc.  in the next few days.  Check in for the word of the day and some page updates that are long overdue.